I’m a passionate collector of antique photographs—especially
daguerreotypes, the earliest form of photography, which were introduced to the
world by Louis Daguerre in France in August of 1839.
In this day of “selfies” and smart-phone videos that share
images of just about everything via the internet as soon as it happens, it’s
hard to imagine the sensation caused by the first photographs—scientifically
accurate portraits “written by the sun”.
A daguerreotype is an image produced on a silver-coated copper plate,
which uses iodine and mercury to develop it.
For early daguerreotypes, you had to sit very still for many minutes,
not smile or blink (your head often in a brace) and the fumes produced in the
developing often made the photographer ill.
Even the touch of a feather on the sensitized silver plate would scar
the image, so daguerreotypes had to be protected under glass and housed in a
case that opens and closes like a book.
My favorite thing to do is to research the story behind an
antique image—who (or what) is the subject?
When was the image taken? What is
the photographer trying to tell us?
While daguerreotype photography spread quickly around the world, (and
nowhere was it more popular than in the United States), most people in the
1840’s and 1850’s, except for the famous or wealthy, would have only one image
taken of themselves in their lifetime.
Often this would be a photo of a serious couple, seated side by side,
soon after their wedding. The photo was
a sort of solemn, official record that they were married. And if a child died, as so often happened, or
an old grandfather who had fought in the Revolutionary War passed away, the
daguerreotype photographer was quickly called to “save the shadow ere the
substance fade”, as the photographers’ ads often put it.
But the photographer could only do his job on a sunny day. Usually the studio would be on a top floor of
a walk-up under a skylight to capture the best light—because there were no
electric lights.
While I have often researched and written essays about
antique and historic photographs—(see the list of titles at right)—I have
rarely written about my own family’s vintage photos, although I have them
hanging on several walls of my house and look at them every day. I’m going to
tell the stories behind some of my antique
photographs, so that you can get clues as to what to look for in your family
photos from the nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries. And I’m going to do it in two parts—first the
stories of my father’s family; all of them Swedes and Norwegians, and then my
mother’s family who were Swiss-French on the maternal side and Scotch-Irish on
the other.
Here is a photograph of the family and house and possessions
of Jorgen J. Odegaard, the man with the furry hat and bushy beard on the
right. He was born in 1856 in Norway and
immigrated to the United States where he married another Norwegian immigrant,
Oline Kaurstad in 1870. They first settled in Iowa, but with no money and no
work, they headed for Minnesota (as did many Scandinavians) in search of free
land in Santiago Township. They settled
near a swamp.
My father told me that Jorgen had the first pair of matched
horses in the county. You can see them
tied up on the left. In photographs of
this era (1880’s) an itinerant photographer would come by, with his camera mounted
on a tripod, knock on your door, and if you wanted a photograph, the family
would be arranged in front of the house, with the most valued possessions in
view. This photo with the rare pair of
horses is like a photo of a man leaning on his brand new sports car. From the same period is a photo I have of the
farmhouse I now live in. The whole
family and farm hands are standing in front of the barn and house with the
prize bull tethered front and center and the ladies in their frilly hats and
long dresses standing in front of the horse-drawn buggy.
The little girl in the white pinafore or apron above was Jorgen’s
oldest child and my grandmother—Ida Odegard (the second “a” in Odegaard fell out
somewhere). The baby in his mother’s arms is John who, I discovered on Google, “married
in 1905 and then operated the first Ford agency in the area in 1912. He offered free driving lessons with every
sale, as no one knew how to operate motor vehicles. He often accepted livestock, buggies and
other items in lieu of cash.”
This photo of Jorgen’s family is not an original— it’s a
simple photocopy which has no value as a photograph, but to me it’s priceless.
Compare it to this photo of the same family around 20 years
later. This photo is an original and printed at the bottom is “Residence of J.
O. Odegard, Santiago, Sherburne Co. Minnesota, June 7 1902”. The little girl in the white pinafore in the
previous photo is now the married lady sitting in a chair in a white dress, her
hand touching her first of four sons—my uncle John Paulson. She had married my grandfather, Par Paulson,
who is seated at the far right. Her parents, Jorgen and Oline, who’s 45 in this
photo, had nine children in all and the little girl toddler between her parents
is a sibling to her married sister Ida. So the toddler on the left is the aunt
to the toddler on the right—and she is the same age as her nephew. I’ve been
told that the house in this photo is the same as the small shack in the first
photo, but it has now been expanded to house the growing family (nine
children!), adding a second floor and two chimneys and lots of space.
The wonderful names of Jorgen’s children are: Ida, John, Mathilda, Edwin, Julius, Oscar,
Olga, Alma, and Odin.
At the top of this post is a wedding photograph of my
grandmother Ida Odegard, marrying my grandfather, Par Paulson, around
1899. I have always thought that large
floral bush on her head looked fairly ridiculous but I showed it to a friend from
Norway and she told me that it is a traditional “Blomster Krans”.
The wedding photograph is a cabinet card –a photograph
mounted on heavy cardboard-- which has been embossed in ornate silver
script “E. S. Hill, St. Cloud, Minn”. Cabinet
cards, 4 inches by 5 ½ inches, were very popular from 1870 to about 1900. Photos
of actors, politicians, freaks and famous people in this format were sold and
collected in albums.
I knew my grandmother Ida well—she let me gather the eggs
from her hen house and, after she beheaded a chicken every Sunday for dinner,
we would de-feather it together. I
didn’t know until I was older that Ida was a very strong-minded and independent
woman who shocked her family by marrying Par Paulson, a Swede instead of a
Norwegian!, and then divorcing him after they had four sons. She moved with her
college-age sons to Minneapolis where she opened a boarding house and became
known for her apple pie. Then she married another Swede, John Erickson, who, like
her first husband, was a mail carrier. I
adored John Erickson, my step-grandfather,
who taught me to shoot his rifle across the Mississippi River. I only met my real grandfather, Par Paulson,
once. He was totally deaf. To "talk" to him you had to write on a blackboard
with chalk.
Here is my grandmother Ida holding a blonde cherub with
sausage curls, a white dress and a bow in its hair. That child is my father, Robert Odegard Paulson,
born April 3, 1905. It may seem shocking
that he’s been dressed and groomed like a little girl, but back in the day,
little boys and girls were dressed alike until about five or six years old. If
you want some clues as to how to tell the boys and girls apart in vintage
photographs check out the post I did called "Tots with Antique Toys--Boy or Girl?"
This photograph is printed on a nine-inch round tin plate
embellished with beautiful flowers. I’ve
seen other, similar photos on tin, dating around the turn of the century, but I
don’t know what they’re called. (They’re
not proper tintypes or ferrotypes—that’s another thing entirely.) In tiny letters under the left corner of the
photo is written “copyrighted 1908 by Crover MFG.” My father would have been three years old in
1908.
In my next blog post I’ll share the stories and photos of my
mother’s French-speaking ancestors, some pre-dating the civil war.
2 comments:
Lovely photographs and history. My mother-in-law once told me the Irish tradition that boys were dressed like girls until they were 3 or 4 was to confuse the Devil. Guess the Devil was after little boys and couldn't be bothered with little girls. Personally, I think keeping toddlers in dresses made it easier for mama to change diapers. Clothes could also be handed down whether boy or girl.
This is wonderful, Joan! THANKS so much for sharing... -xo
Post a Comment